Case Study — AstraFi
Automating AML, KYC, and Regulatory Reporting for a Digital Asset Exchange
87% false positive reduction and same-day KYC for a $500M/month digital asset exchange
Industry
Digital Asset Exchange / Fintech
Timeline
18 weeks
Team
6 engineers
Tech
Python ML + PostgreSQL + Node.js
The Challenge
A digital asset exchange processing $500M monthly was manually reviewing AML alerts and submitting regulatory reports. The compliance team of 12 was reviewing 1,200 AML alerts weekly with an 85% false positive rate. KYC onboarding took 30 days. A regulatory deadline required SAR filing automation within 90 days.
Our Approach
How We Solved It
ML-Based AML Alert Scoring
Trained a graph neural network on transaction patterns and entity relationships to score AML alerts by risk level, reducing the alert queue from 1,200 to 180 genuinely suspicious transactions per week.
Automated KYC Orchestration
Built an automated KYC workflow that orchestrates identity verification, document OCR, sanctions screening, PEP checks, and adverse media search in parallel — reducing KYC cycle time from 30 days to 4 hours for 92% of applicants.
SAR Filing Automation
Automated Suspicious Activity Report generation from reviewed alerts, populating all required FinCEN SAR fields from the transaction data and analyst review notes, cutting SAR filing time from 3 hours to 12 minutes.
Regulatory Reporting Dashboard
Built a real-time compliance posture dashboard showing transaction monitoring coverage, alert queue status, KYC completion rates, and upcoming regulatory filing deadlines with automated submission workflows.
Engineering Process
How We Built It
Graph Neural Network for Transaction Patterns
Standard rule-based AML produces high false positive rates because it evaluates transactions in isolation. A graph neural network that models entity relationships and transaction network patterns identifies structuring and layering patterns invisible to rules.
Human-in-the-Loop by Design
Automated scoring reduces queue volume but does not auto-clear alerts. All final disposition decisions require analyst review and signature, maintaining regulatory defensibility and auditor confidence in the ML system.
Audit Trail as Core Infrastructure
Every compliance decision — alert disposition, KYC approval, SAR filing — is recorded with analyst identity, timestamp, supporting evidence, and reviewer sign-off in an immutable audit ledger.
Architecture Decisions
Key Technical Choices
Graph Database for AML Relationship Analysis
Neo4j graph database for entity relationship modeling versus PostgreSQL joins — multi-hop transaction relationship queries that take 45 seconds in PostgreSQL execute in 80ms in Neo4j.
Microservice KYC Orchestration Over Monolithic Workflow
Parallel execution of 7 independent KYC checks (identity, documents, sanctions, PEP, media, address, risk scoring) reduced KYC cycle time more than any individual check optimization.
Workflow Engine Over Custom State Machine
Used Temporal.io workflow engine for KYC orchestration — it handles retries, timeouts, human approval steps, and audit logging as first-class primitives without custom state machine code.
Results
What We Delivered
Solution Blueprint
How It All Fits Together
- Graph neural network (AML)
- Transaction pattern rules
- Neo4j entity graph
- Parallel 7-check verification
- Document OCR pipeline
- Sanctions & PEP screening
- Automated SAR generation
- FinCEN submission workflow
- Immutable compliance audit ledger
Lessons Learned
What We Improved
False Positive Reduction Requires Regulator Agreement
Before deploying the ML scoring model, we met with the compliance team's regulatory counsel to agree on the acceptable false negative rate. Reducing false positives without regulatory alignment creates examination risk.
KYC Orchestration Is a Distributed Systems Problem
The 7 parallel KYC checks each have different SLAs, failure modes, and retry semantics. Using Temporal.io instead of a custom orchestrator saved 6 weeks of reliability engineering.
SAR Narrative Quality Requires Structured Analyst Notes
The first automated SARs had poor narrative quality because analyst review notes were unstructured free text. We redesigned the analyst review form with structured fields that map directly to SAR narrative sections.
More From AstraFi
Related Case Studies
Institutional Finance / Digital Assets
Digital Asset Operations Platform
SOC 2 Type II digital asset custody and settlement for institutional allocators
Fintech / Payments
Treasury Management System
From 2-day cash forecasting in spreadsheets to real-time treasury intelligence
Institutional Finance / Hedge Fund
Risk Monitoring Dashboard
Sub-200ms risk runs replacing a 4-hour overnight batch across 50,000+ positions
Related Research
Research Reports for This Industry
Enterprise AI Adoption Trends 2026
Enterprise AI has crossed the operational threshold. Seventy-two percent of Fortune 500 organizations now run at least one AI system in production — and the average enterprise manages 3.4 concurrent AI initiatives. This report maps the state of enterprise AI across healthcare, manufacturing, financial services, retail, and beyond.
Read reportSaaS Development Benchmarks 2026
What does it actually cost to build and scale a SaaS product in 2026? This report benchmarks engineering team size, deployment frequency, infrastructure spend, and time-to-market across 521 SaaS companies — from $1M ARR seed-stage startups to $100M+ enterprise SaaS leaders.
Read reportAI Agent Adoption Report 2026
AI agents are the most transformative enterprise technology category of the 2025–2026 cycle. This dedicated report examines architecture patterns, deployment economics, governance approaches, and the emerging multi-agent production landscape across 634 organizations — the most comprehensive agent-specific enterprise research available.
Read reportEnterprise Cloud Cost Benchmark Report 2026
Enterprise cloud spend reached $780 billion globally in 2025 — yet 32% remains unoptimised waste according to our benchmark data. This report quantifies cloud cost maturity across AWS, Azure, and GCP, mapping FinOps practice adoption, reserved capacity utilisation, and savings plan optimisation against peer benchmarks.
Read reportPricing Intelligence
Related Cost Guides
Transparent pricing breakdowns to help you plan and budget your technology investments.
Decision Intelligence
Related Compare Guides
Side-by-side decision frameworks to help your team choose the right technology approach.
Blockchain vs Traditional Database: When Blockchain Actually Solves the Problem
Use a traditional database in almost all enterprise contexts. Blockchain is justified only when you have multiple mutual
Custom Software vs SaaS: Which Is Right for Your Business?
Custom software wins when differentiation, data control, or complex integration requirements make SaaS lock-in a strateg
Explore Further
Work With Halkwinds
Build Something Exceptional
Partner with the team that built AstraFi.